Notes below are long.. for Action points Go to the End
ñ
changed a lot in 30 years, a lot of people like being against something
ñ
leanne – planning big topic through Wales, what can we focus on?
ñ
SD can overrule existing LDP and policy, this is on the table as a short term proposal. Need to change it so not yes or no, need consultation process with planers helping
ñ
NP won't publish guidelines when people put in app don't know how to get it right and likely that planners will decline as doesn't meet venecular guidelines which not published – this is verging on human rights issue – obey invisible rules!
ñ
Issues not uniqe to Newport, must be same all over the park
ñ
Lack of culture of deference to applicant, in Snowdonia national park this has changed to culture of deference and support.
ñ
NP should be elected but council committee leave it to officers so electing officers is not enough
ñ
Appointed members ok as have some knowledge, if elected may be worse as they wouldn't know anything. Very inconsistent as they make it up as they go along
ñ
The Park says over 80% applications succeed, this hides those put off applying at early stages eg pre-ap.
ñ
A tax of £25,000 for a new build and other regulatory costs pushes development out of the range of locals and working people
ñ
Plaid has many architects and lawyers who could team up to monitor how parks behave
ñ
also money, if have money then get what you want as can appeal etc
ñ
have to know how to talk to each planning officer
ñ
sustinability not included
ñ
renewbles not supported
ñ
NP view area as a tourist playground but don't try to support local businesses, lots shut down, no jobs for young people so leave. 50%+ holiday homes, people retire here. Huge houses bult and not clear if planers can see what impact houses will have once built. Instead of them trying to help get negative
ñ
too much trusted to council officers
ñ
too many holiday homes, need to be controlled
ñ
should be change of use if holiday home
ñ
takes time, should double council tax and use the surplus to buy homes to rent to locals when come on market
ñ
planners reference TAN's that suit their case
ñ
elected committee – we need to collate consensus in the area and take on the system rather than individuals appealing individually. Culture of NO. many want to make plannning app but know answer is NO and costs too much to appeal. Building regs are very clear and can ask for exemptions = good. Planning officers say can take to appeal but expensive
ñ
Leanne I'm launching a Sustainable communities commission, planning part of this. Invite all to get involved / contribute to it. Plaid commission for plaid manifestos, need robust polices for elections. We need expertise from inside and outside Plaid.
ñ
should be able to speak to planers about ideas and work out route forward rather than submit something then get a NO
ñ
parks should be even handed when reporting on apps. Evidence in favour eg petition is minimised or not reported to committee. Conservation officers have limited role but could cover whole NP.
ñ
Petty and absurd rules which take no account of carbon costs, eg requiring tons of concrete instead of none
ñ
live in culture of expert, officers don't view themselves as public servants so councillors defer to them
ñ
maybe set up campaign group, achieveable goals, input into ongoing consultations
ñ
Environment bill which is in preparation seeks pilots newport could be used. Need to get park committee members to speak to public
ñ
committee members not allowed to speak to people about their apps, if they do prevented from speaking or voting at committee. This twists the term 'declaring an interest' which is means financial or personal gain to meaing showing any interest in the application before the meeting!
ñ
Delegated powers in other area of Wales: committee know in advance which will be delegated and how officers recommend determining so they can ‘call in’ the decision if important. Is this how it works in Park? If refused the officers should explain why to committee
ñ
can town council do more, need sensibel advice on what will make a planning app ok, need planners involved
ñ
vol committee?
ñ
NP councillors need to be elected directly not from councillors, one from each area, and to include specialists eg in design, eco building
ñ
To get a change we need to make a furore
ñ
In the past Newport town council developed its own local planning policies. Park said ‘Marvellous, just what we want’ and completely disregarded them.
ACTION POINTS
Suggested Conclusion – Some Actions to be taken by new CountyCouncillor
ñ
Review operation of delegated powers (as suggested above)
ñ
Investigate training for committee and officers to instill culture of yes with guidance, providing support and deference to applicants, respect for working countryside, family and cultural continuity, and needs of the future – sustainable development
ñ
Investigate legality of secret rules – no published guidelines, validity of officers making up the guidelines, remove any barriers to evolving published guidelines working with the communities – link this to communities evolving their own planning policies.
ñ
Review how committee members are chosen, to include critics of park, those with appropriate skills and those directly elected by their communities (community appointees?)
ñ
Change the requirement for up front expense of surveys before applying. Instead give permission subject to surveys to avoid waste of money to applicants.
Challenge the misuse of 'declaring an interest' and show that there is no legal justification for preventing members taking part if they have shown interest in the situation by learning about it before the meeting
ñ
Investigate potential for Newport to be trial area for new approach to regulations described in Welsh govt green paper ‘Sustaining a Living Wales’